Predictive maintenance models that read vibration and thermal signatures, computer vision systems that catch defects faster than human QC, and demand forecasting that survives bullwhip. AI built by people who understand the physics of your equipment, not just the math.
Most manufacturing AI projects die in the gap between data science and operations. A model is trained on historical Historian data — vibration, current draw, temperature — and predicts pump failure with 89% accuracy. The data scientists celebrate. The maintenance team ignores it. Why? Because the model alerts at the same time the gauges turn red, and it doesn't tell the technician which bearing, which lubrication interval was missed, or which spare to pull from the storeroom. The model is technically correct and operationally useless.
The AI that actually works on a plant floor is built backwards from the operator's decision. Predictive maintenance models that surface 7-14 days before failure with a recommended work-order template. Computer vision QC systems with FPY targets baked into the loss function and a clear escalation path when confidence drops below threshold. Demand forecasts that include exogenous variables — weather, commodity prices, supplier lead-times — not just historical sales. AI that respects the gemba.
Vibration spectrum analysis, motor current signature analysis (MCSA), and thermal imaging fed into ensemble models that predict bearing, gearbox, and motor failures 7-14 days before they occur. Output is a CMMS work order with the right spare, the right technician skill, and the right shutdown window — not a dashboard alert nobody acts on.
Edge-deployed CV models for surface defect detection on sheet metal, weld inspection, dimensional gauging, and assembly verification. Trained on your product images, calibrated to your acceptance criteria, integrated with line-stop logic. Replaces or augments human QC with measurable FPY improvement and full traceability for IATF 16949 / AS9100 audits.
Hierarchical forecasts at SKU × DC × week, factoring in promotions, weather, commodity indices, and supplier OTD. Feeds the S&OP cycle and the MRP run with measurably better signal than the moving-average forecast embedded in your ERP. Specifically targets the bullwhip points in your supply chain.
Manufacturing AI delivered for production: model design that starts from the operator decision (not the data), training pipelines on your Historian and MES data, MLOps for drift monitoring, edge deployment for vision and PdM models, integration into the CMMS or MES that closes the loop, and the change management that makes the maintenance team actually use it.
The full AI Consulting practice across industries.
All manufacturing technology services from Xylity.
Industry-specific consulting across the verticals we serve.
Typically 6-9 months for a single critical asset class (e.g., all medium-voltage motors in a plant). The math: one prevented unplanned outage on a critical line in automotive or process manufacturing typically exceeds the entire model build cost. We start with one asset class, prove the savings against actual MTBF and MTTR data, then expand.
Not necessarily — but you need clean, time-stamped sensor data with at least 12 months of history including failure events. If you have OSIsoft PI, AVEVA, or Rockwell FactoryTalk Historian already, we can typically start within weeks. If you don't, we'll architect the ingestion (OPC UA → edge gateway → cloud) as part of the engagement.
Yes. Pre-qualified ML engineers and data scientists with manufacturing domain experience — predictive maintenance, computer vision for QC, time-series forecasting, and the engineering literacy to read a P&ID and ask the right questions on a gemba walk. 4-stage consulting-led matching, 92% first-match acceptance.
Predictive maintenance, vision QC, and demand forecasting built backwards from the operator's decision — not the data scientist's notebook.