Generative AI grounded in your SOPs, work instructions, P&IDs, and engineering archives. RAG agents for operators, generative design for engineering, and synthetic data for AI training. Without the hallucinations that put safety at risk.
The first instinct with generative AI in manufacturing is to deploy a chatbot on top of the engineering wiki and call it a knowledge management win. That works until an operator asks how to clear a jam on a line that handles flammable materials and the chatbot, lacking the actual lockout/tagout procedure, generates a confident-sounding sequence that bypasses the safety interlock. The lawsuit writes itself. Manufacturing generative AI cannot tolerate the kind of cheerful confabulation that consumer GenAI is built on.
Generative AI for manufacturing requires retrieval-augmented generation grounded in your actual document library, citation of every source with explicit "I don't know" responses when no source matches, role-based scoping so an operator never sees engineering-restricted content, and explicit blocks on any topic that touches safety, lockout/tagout, or regulatory compliance — those go to a qualified human, every time. Set up correctly, generative AI in manufacturing is a force multiplier. Set up casually, it's a liability.
Generative AI agents grounded in your SOPs, work instructions, troubleshooting guides, and equipment manuals via RAG. Cite every source, refuse to answer when no source matches, escalate safety-critical questions to humans. Cuts time-to-answer for routine questions while keeping the safety boundary intact.
Generative AI for engineering — drafts FMEAs from past failure data, generates first-pass capacity studies, summarizes test reports, suggests design alternatives based on engineering standards and past project archive. Engineers retain the authoring role; the AI compresses the busywork.
Generative models that produce synthetic defect images for training computer vision QC systems — solving the cold-start problem when real defects are rare. Validated against real samples to ensure the synthetic data actually represents production conditions.
Generative AI delivered with manufacturing-grade discipline: content ingestion from SOPs / work instructions / drawings / engineering archives, RAG architecture with cited sources and explicit refusal, role-based scoping and safety-topic blocks, evaluation harness to measure groundedness and accuracy, and the change management that introduces it to the floor without breaking trust.
The full Generative AI Consulting practice across industries.
All manufacturing technology services from Xylity.
Industry-specific consulting across the verticals we serve.
Three layers. First, explicit topic blocks on lockout/tagout, electrical isolation, confined space, and hot work — these always escalate to a qualified human, no exceptions. Second, RAG that only generates from your actual SOP library and cites the source. Third, an evaluation harness that tests the model against known safety scenarios before every deployment. Architecture matters more than the model choice.
Commercial LLMs (Azure OpenAI, Anthropic via Bedrock) typically deliver better accuracy out of the box and are easier to maintain. Open-source models (Llama, Mistral) make sense when data sovereignty, ITAR / export control, or cost at scale require it. We help you decide based on your specific constraints, not model marketing.
Yes. Pre-qualified AI engineers and ML practitioners with RAG experience, manufacturing domain knowledge, and the safety discipline to build agents that don't hallucinate operating procedures. 4-stage consulting-led matching, 92% first-match acceptance.
Grounded RAG, cited sources, safety topic blocks — generative AI that's a force multiplier, not a liability.