BI for the metrics logistics operators actually run on — on-time performance, cost per mile, lane profitability, customer scorecards, fleet utilization. Built on a semantic layer that reconciles to the settlement run and the monthly close.
Every logistics operator has the same painful conversation at the monthly operations review: the operations VP's on-time number doesn't match the CFO's on-time number, and both differ from what customer service is reporting to the Tier 1 customer in the quarterly business review. The discrepancies are usually small but they're consistent — and they erode trust in the BI system within months. The root causes are always the same: different definitions of "on-time" (pickup vs delivery, appointment vs window, with vs without grace period), inconsistent exclusions for weather and customer-caused delays, and dashboards that pull from different layers of the data warehouse without documented joins. Within three months, the BI tool gets bypassed and everyone runs their own spreadsheets again.
Logistics BI succeeds when it's built on a governed semantic layer with one definition of every metric, calculated centrally, reconciled to the settlement run, and traceable back to the source transaction. On-time, cost per mile, lane profitability, customer scorecards — all the metrics that matter — defined once, used everywhere, signed off by finance, operations, and customer service together. That alignment is what separates BI that matters from BI that gets ignored.
On-time pickup, on-time delivery, and OTIF decomposed by customer, lane, mode, and carrier. With proper handling of the exclusions and grace periods each customer contract specifies. The view that drives daily operations decisions and quarterly business reviews.
Load-level profitability with fully-loaded cost, customer margin, and lane P&L. Reconciled monthly to the settlement run so finance and operations see the same numbers.
Fleet utilization, driver productivity, equipment dwell, and the asset-level metrics that drive CapEx decisions and fleet replenishment. Tied to ELD and maintenance data for a complete asset view.
Logistics BI built for trust: semantic layer with governed metric definitions, dashboards reconciled to the settlement run and monthly close, customer-specific on-time logic, integration with TMS / WMS / ELD / ERP, role-based access for operations / finance / customer service, and the change control process that keeps metrics stable across reorganizations.
The full Business Intelligence Consulting practice across industries.
All logistics technology services from Xylity.
Industry-specific consulting across the verticals we serve.
Honestly — you don't, without executive sponsorship. We bring a battle-tested definition library based on industry consensus and customer contract common practice, then facilitate the workshops that get operations, finance, and customer service to align on the definitions. The technical work is easy; the alignment work is hard.
Power BI wins on cost and Microsoft ecosystem integration. Tableau wins on customer-facing dashboard sophistication. Qlik wins on associative exploration. We help you decide based on your existing stack and audience.
Yes. Pre-qualified BI developers and analytics engineers with logistics KPI fluency — on-time logic, lane profitability, fleet utilization — and the SQL discipline to build models that reconcile to the settlement run. 92% first-match acceptance.
Governed metric definitions, reconciled dashboards, and semantic layer alignment — so the monthly ops review stops being an argument.