Skip to main content

Business Intelligence for Investment Management: Performance, Risk, and Client Reporting

BI for asset managers — performance attribution dashboards, risk dashboards reconciled to the IBOR, GIPS-compliant client reporting, and the AUM and revenue analytics that the CFO and CEO review every morning.

Why Investment BI Numbers Don't Match the IBOR

An asset manager's BI team builds performance dashboards. The portfolio managers review them and find that the holdings don't quite match what they see in the OMS, the performance numbers don't reconcile to the official accounting book of record, and the attribution analysis uses different sector classifications than the IBOR. Each difference is small. Together they make the dashboards a parallel reality that PMs don't trust for decisions and the CFO can't use for client communication. Within months, the data team is rebuilding from a different source and the dashboards everyone agreed on become the dashboards no one uses.
Investment BI done right starts with IBOR/ABOR reconciliation as the non-negotiable foundation. The semantic layer sources from the official book of record after every pricing cycle. Holdings, transactions, and performance match the accounting system exactly. Attribution uses the official sector classifications, currency conventions, and benchmark definitions. Risk metrics align with the official risk system. With this reconciliation, the dashboards become the trusted view across the front, middle, and back office. Without it, every team builds their own version and the firm operates on multiple inconsistent realities.

How Investment Firms Apply It

Performance Attribution Dashboards

Performance attribution by sector, country, factor, security, and time period — using the Brinson model or factor-based attribution depending on the strategy. Reconciled to the IBOR and the GIPS composite calculation.

Performance + attribution + Brinson + factor + GIPS

Risk & Exposure Dashboards

Position-level and aggregated risk metrics — VaR, beta, factor exposures, sector concentrations, single-name limits. Reconciled to the official risk system used for limit monitoring.

Risk + VaR + factor exposures + concentrations

AUM, Revenue & Flows

AUM dashboards by strategy, vehicle, client segment, and channel — with flows analysis (gross subscriptions, redemptions, market appreciation), revenue attribution by basis point fee, and the executive views the CFO and CEO need.

AUM + flows + revenue + executive

What You Receive

Investment BI delivered with IBOR-reconciled trust: semantic layer from the official book of record, performance attribution dashboards, risk and exposure analytics, AUM and revenue dashboards, GIPS composite reporting support, integration with OMS/PMS, and the change control that survives portfolio manager and CFO transitions.

From Our Blog

Business Intelligence for Investment — FAQ

How do you reconcile BI to the IBOR?

Through automated reconciliation jobs after every pricing cycle that compare BI semantic layer totals against the official book of record. Any variance gets flagged before users access the data. We treat this as the first deliverable; without it, BI doesn't earn trust.

Yes — GIPS composite calculation requires specific methodology (composite construction, performance calculation, dispersion measurement). We encode the GIPS standards in the semantic layer and produce composite-level reporting that aligns with the GIPS verification. The methodology is precise; we work with the GIPS team during implementation.

Yes. Pre-qualified BI developers with investment management experience — performance attribution, risk reporting, GIPS, IBOR reconciliation, and the OMS/PMS data structures investment BI requires. 92% first-match acceptance.

Performance Numbers That
Match the IBOR

GIPS-aware, IBOR-reconciled, attribution-correct — investment BI built for the front, middle, and back office.