Top Dynamics 365 Implementation Partners: The Short Answer
The five Dynamics 365 implementation partners worth shortlisting in 2026 are Hitachi Solutions, Xylity Technologies, HSO, TTEC Digital and Cegeka — and which of them is right for you depends almost entirely on which Dynamics product you are actually buying.
That is not a hedge. Microsoft does not run a “Dynamics 365 Partner of the Year” award. It runs separate awards by product, and the 2025 cycle had five Dynamics categories with five different winners: Hitachi Solutions took Finance, HSO took Sales and Customer Insights, TTEC Digital took Service, Cegeka took Supply Chain, and Infinity Group took Business Central. No firm won twice.
Yet almost every comparison in this category publishes one ordered list, as though a firm that excels at finance and operations is automatically the right choice for customer engagement. Microsoft's own certification tracks say otherwise, and on one product the wrong choice is unrecoverable.
Disclosure: this comparison is published by Xylity Technologies, and Xylity appears in it. Of the five competing lists reviewed, four rank their own publisher and three place themselves first. One of those five — to its credit — does split its recommendations by product, and we say so below rather than pretending the failing is universal.
A brand, not a capability
Dynamics 365 is not one product. Finance and Supply Chain Management run on the finance and operations platform; Sales, Customer Service and Field Service run on Dataverse. They share a brand and little else, and Microsoft's own structures reflect that.
The functional credentials do not overlap. Microsoft keeps functional consultant certifications strictly product-specific: Finance and Supply Chain Management sit on the finance and operations side, Customer Service and the customer-engagement credentials on the Dataverse side. A consultant certified on one side holds nothing that qualifies them on the other. Above that level the picture changed in June 2026, when Microsoft retired its separate finance-and-operations and Power Platform solution architect credentials and consolidated them into a single Agentic AI Business Solutions Architect credential — so architect certification no longer distinguishes the two sides, while functional certification still does.
The specializations are workload-specific too. Microsoft's Business Applications specializations are Finance, Sales, Service, Supply Chain, Small and Midsize Business Management, and the new Agentic Business Solutions, which was formed in 2026 by merging the former Low Code Application Development and Intelligent Automation specializations. A partner holding Finance has demonstrated nothing about Service.
Project Operations ships in three deployment types across two platforms — and Microsoft states there is no out-of-box supported migration of data between them.
And on one product the choice is effectively permanent. Project Operations has three deployment types. Core runs on Dataverse alone, with proforma invoicing only — no customer-facing invoicing and no revenue recognition. The ERP-integrated and manufacturing types run on finance and operations apps and have both. A Dataverse-native firm will naturally provision Core; a finance and operations firm will provision the integrated type. If your requirement includes revenue recognition and your partner picked Core, Microsoft's documentation states there is no out-of-box supported migration of data between deployment types — moving it requires custom scripts, custom mapping of concepts and potentially manual intervention.
One honest qualification, because the argument is stronger with it than without. The split is real but not absolute at the top. Across 2023, 2024 and 2025 — fifteen Dynamics category wins — exactly one firm took both a finance-and-operations and a customer-engagement crown in the same year: Hitachi Solutions, with Supply Chain Management and Services in 2023. HSO has won on both sides too, in consecutive years rather than the same one. A handful of firms genuinely do both. Most do not, and no listicle tells you which is which.
Who won what
| 2025 category | Winner | Platform side | What it signals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamics 365 Finance | Hitachi Solutions | Finance & Operations | Core ERP depth |
| Dynamics 365 Supply Chain | Cegeka | Finance & Operations | Manufacturing and distribution |
| Dynamics 365 Sales & Customer Insights | HSO | Customer Engagement | Revenue-side CRM |
| Dynamics 365 Service | TTEC Digital | Customer Engagement | Contact centre and service |
| Dynamics 365 Business Central | Infinity Group | SMB ERP | A separate market again |
The five firms
1. Hitachi Solutions
Best when the programme genuinely spans both sides of Dynamics. The strongest verified record in this category. It won 2025 Dynamics 365 Finance Partner of the Year and was a finalist in Sales and Customer Insights, Supply Chain and Low Code Application Development in the same cycle — four of the seven business-applications categories. It is also the only firm in the last three award cycles to have taken both a finance-and-operations and a customer-engagement award in a single year, winning Supply Chain Management and Services in 2023. A subsidiary of Hitachi, Ltd., with no ownership change found in the last two years.
The trade-off: breadth at this scale means the pod you meet is not necessarily the pod you get, and Hitachi's organisation spans separate regional entities — its 2025 Finance award was announced under both a global and a US entity name. Ask which entity contracts and which country staffs the work before you sign.
2. Xylity Technologies
Best when the implementation is scoped and the gap is a consultant on one specific side. Xylity is a consulting-led contingent talent partner, not a Microsoft implementation partner — and on this page that maps onto the argument directly. The split that makes choosing a firm hard is the same split that makes hiring hard: a D365 Finance and Operations consultant and a D365 Customer Engagement consultant are different people, and most teams need one urgently rather than both permanently. A four-stage consulting-led matching process returns a first curated profile in an average of 4.3 days at 92% first-match acceptance, from 200+ pre-qualified delivery partners and 5,000+ specialists. Delivered work includes D365 Supply Chain unifying five plants and lifting inventory accuracy from 82% to 99% and D365 Field Service raising technician utilisation 30% at an oilfield services firm.
The trade-off: Xylity holds no Microsoft specialization and will not own the implementation or carry fixed-scope delivery risk. For a multi-country ERP programme, engage one of the four firms around it. Where Xylity fits is the narrower and more common case — a Dynamics 365 rollout already moving and short one specialist for a quarter.
3. HSO
Best for revenue-side Dynamics with genuine cross-side history. HSO won 2025 Sales and Customer Insights, 2024 Supply Chain Management and 2023 Finance — both sides of the platform, in consecutive cycles. It describes itself as the largest independent Microsoft Dynamics partner globally, serving 1,400-plus customers across more than 30 countries, founded in 1987.
The trade-off: the independence claim needs a footnote. Bain Capital agreed to invest in August 2025, with Carlyle exiting after holding since 2019 and founder Peter J. ter Maaten remaining a significant shareholder. That is a second consecutive private equity owner, which usually implies a defined exit horizon. Terms were not disclosed.
4. TTEC Digital
Best when the Dynamics project is really a contact centre project. TTEC Digital won 2025 Dynamics 365 Service Partner of the Year, and that category is the honest description of its strength: service, contact centre and customer experience rather than ERP. If your brief is Customer Service or Field Service with a CCaaS dimension, this is a more specific fit than any generalist on a longer list.
The trade-off: the specificity cuts the other way — there is no finance and operations story here, so a programme touching Finance or Supply Chain needs a second firm. There is also a live corporate question: in August 2026 TTEC Holdings announced that its board had authorised management to evaluate strategic alternatives for the TTEC Digital business, with PJT Partners advising. Nothing has been agreed, but on a multi-year engagement ask who you will be contracting with in a year.
5. Cegeka
Best for European manufacturing and distribution on finance and operations. Cegeka won 2025 Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Partner of the Year — and not one of the five competing lists reviewed for this article mentions it at all, despite that being a current Microsoft Dynamics crown. For a supply-chain-led implementation, it is the most conspicuous omission from the lists we reviewed.
The trade-off: European centre of gravity. For a North America-only rollout the firms above will be closer to the work, and Cegeka's brand recognition with US procurement functions is thinner than its award record deserves.
Also in the running
Avanade, the Accenture–Microsoft joint venture, won the 2024 Dynamics 365 Sales and Customer Insights award and does not appear as a winner or finalist in any of the five 2025 Dynamics categories — a useful reminder that award records move year to year, and that a firm's position on most lists reflects recognition rather than the current cycle. EY won 2024 Dynamics 365 Finance and was a 2025 finalist in both Finance and Service. PwC won 2025 Low Code Application Development and was a Dynamics 365 Finance finalist. HCLTech won 2024 Dynamics 365 Service.
How to choose the right one
1. Name the products before you name the firms
Finance and Supply Chain Management sit on one platform; Sales, Customer Service and Field Service sit on another. Write down which you are buying, then filter for firms with an award, specialization or reference on that specific side. Most shortlists are assembled in the opposite order.
2. On Project Operations, settle the deployment type in writing
Core on Dataverse has proforma invoicing only — no customer-facing invoicing, no revenue recognition. The ERP-integrated type has both. Microsoft states there is no out-of-box supported migration of data between deployment types, so this is effectively a one-way decision made early, usually by whichever side of the platform your partner knows best.
3. Ask for certifications by exam, not by count
“400 Dynamics certified consultants” is not an answer. Ask how many hold finance and operations functional credentials versus customer engagement ones, and how many are on your account. The two do not overlap, so a large total can still mean zero depth on your side.
4. Work back from the finance and operations service calendar
Finance and operations releases carry enforced auto-updates and a published end-of-service date — version 10.0.47 reaches end of service on 20 November 2026. A partner should know which version you are on and when it expires without looking it up.
5. Check who owns the firm
HSO has had two consecutive private equity owners. Several mid-market Dynamics firms are PE-held or have been absorbed. None of that is disqualifying, but it sets the rate card and the escalation path on a multi-year programme, and no competing list tracks it.
6. Decide whether you need a partner or a person
A partner engagement carries methodology, delivery structure and a minimum size — right for a migration or a greenfield rollout. If a competent team is mid-build and short one functional consultant on one module, a contingent specialist starts sooner and costs a fraction.
Frequently asked questions
No. Microsoft runs separate Dynamics awards by product. In the 2025 cycle, announced in November 2025, there were five: Finance, won by Hitachi Solutions; Supply Chain, won by Cegeka; Sales and Customer Insights, won by HSO; Service, won by TTEC Digital; and Business Central, won by Infinity Group. Five categories, five different winners. Any article citing a single “Dynamics 365 Partner of the Year” is describing an award that does not exist. The 2026 winners had not been announced as of late September 2026.
Finance and Supply Chain Management run on the finance and operations platform; Sales, Customer Service and Field Service run on Dataverse. Microsoft's functional consultant credentials are product-specific and do not overlap between the two sides. At architect level Microsoft moved the other way in June 2026, retiring its separate finance-and-operations and Power Platform architect credentials in favour of one consolidated architect credential. Microsoft's Business Applications specializations remain workload-specific — Finance, Sales, Service, Supply Chain and the rest are earned separately. In practice these are still two different consulting practices sharing a brand.
Because it is effectively permanent. Project Operations has three deployment types across two platforms. Core runs on Dataverse with proforma invoicing only, lacking customer-facing invoicing and revenue recognition. The ERP-integrated and manufacturing types run on finance and operations apps and include both. Microsoft's documentation states there is no out-of-box supported migration of data between deployment types — moving it requires custom scripts, custom mapping of concepts and potentially manual intervention. A partner naturally provisions the type its own practice knows, so the decision often gets made by the shortlist rather than by the requirement.
Finance and operations apps run on automatic service updates, with four released each year, a minimum of two required annually, and only one consecutive update able to be paused. Each version has a published end-of-service date: version 10.0.47 reaches end of service on 20 November 2026. Separately, Microsoft announced in August 2026 that it is retiring the twice-yearly release wave model in favour of continuous publishing, with the Release Planner retiring on 15 November 2026 and roadmap content moving to the AI at Work roadmap.
Microsoft does not rank Dynamics partners as one field, because Dynamics is not one product. Five categories produced five different winners in 2025, the certification tracks never overlap, and on Project Operations the platform choice cannot be undone. Name the products you are buying first, then shortlist against that side specifically — and treat any single ordered list of “top D365 partners” as a ranking of brand recognition rather than of fit.
Go Deeper
Three routes on — the platform, the ERP side, the CRM side.
How the finance and operations and Dataverse sides actually differ.
The Dataverse side, where the CRM and Power Platform skills sit.
The most common Dynamics staffing problem is not a shortage of consultants. It is needing a finance and operations specialist when the team you have is all Dataverse, three weeks before a go-live. Xylity supplies whichever side is missing — 4.3 days to a first curated profile, 92% first-match acceptance, across 22 industries. More on Dynamics 365 Customer Service and Dynamics 365 for BFSI.
Related Reading
Top Dynamics 365 Implementation Partners in 2026
Top Business Central Partners in 2026
Top 5 Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations Consulting Companies
SAP to Dynamics 365 Migration: Timeline, Cost, and Risks
Dynamics 365 Implementation Cost: Complete Guide 2026
The Real Cost of a Failed ERP Implementation
Mid-rollout and short one Dynamics consultant?
Name the module and the window — finance and operations or customer engagement — and curated profiles come back in days.
Contact Us | Xylity Technologies →