Power BI dashboards for combined ratio, loss ratio, persistency, claims cycle time, and producer profitability — built on a real semantic model that reconciles to the financial close. Not click-and-drag charts that drift apart in month four.
An insurance Power BI dashboard goes live, leadership loves it, and four months later nobody trusts it. The story is always the same: the underlying data model didn't handle accident-year correctly, the combined ratio drifted from the financial close after a reserve adjustment, and someone presented numbers to the board that didn't match the appointed actuary's quarterly opinion. The trust never quite comes back. The root cause is almost always architectural — direct queries against operational systems, inconsistent measures, no version control on the .pbix files, and pushed accident-year logic into the visualization layer instead of the model.
Power BI in insurance succeeds when it's built like a real BI system: a tabular semantic model with proper accident-year and underwriting-year dimensions, DAX measures defined once and reused everywhere, incremental refresh against a curated layer that reconciles to the GL, row-level security for line-of-business and region access, and a governed publishing pipeline. The visuals are the easy part; the discipline underneath is what determines whether the dashboard is still trusted in month six.
Combined ratio decomposed into loss ratio, LAE ratio, and expense ratio — by line, segment, channel, and accident year. Drilled to specific producers and accounts. Refreshed daily from the curated layer with automatic reconciliation to the GL.
Claims cycle time, severity, leakage, and adjuster scorecards. Tied to ClaimCenter or Duck Creek Claims data with proper FNOL and closure date dimensions. The view that drives daily claims operations decisions.
Agency, broker, and direct channel scorecards combining production, profitability, persistency, and service metrics. Identifies which channels and producers create profitable growth.
Power BI delivered as a real BI system, not a stack of fragile reports: tabular semantic model with insurance dimensions, governed DAX measures, incremental refresh against a curated layer, row-level security for LOB and region access, deployment pipelines for dev / test / prod, source control for .pbix files, and the training that lets your analysts build their own reports against the model without breaking governance.
The full Power BI Consulting practice across industries.
All insurance technology services from Xylity.
Industry-specific consulting across the verticals we serve.
If you're standing up a fresh data platform, Microsoft Fabric is increasingly the right answer. If you have an existing Premium investment with a working data layer, stay on Premium and add Fabric capabilities incrementally. We help you decide based on actual requirements.
Yes — when modeled properly. The cohort logic belongs in the tabular model with calculated dimensions and properly handled relationships, not in DAX measures or visualization-layer filters. We've delivered insurance Power BI implementations where the same dashboard supports calendar-period and accident-year views from the same model.
Yes. Pre-qualified Power BI developers with insurance KPI fluency, accident-year modeling experience, and DAX expertise. 92% first-match acceptance.
Real semantic model, accident-year dimensions, DAX governance, and reconciliation to the close — not click-and-drag dashboards.