Financial analytics for the dual reality of logistics — operational metrics and financial outcome on the same page. True lane P&L with fully-loaded cost, customer margin including accessorial leakage, and the variance analysis that ties operational performance to margin.
The logistics CFO knows margin is wrong somewhere and can't tell where. Revenue is growing 12% but EBITDA is flat. The operations VP insists the top 20 customers are profitable. The account managers are sure their lanes are healthy. Finance is running the month-end close on standard costs that were set in Q1 and haven't been updated since. When everyone looks at the same P&L they see different stories, and by the time the year-end true-up runs, three pricing decisions have already been made on the wrong numbers. The root cause is always the same: cost accounting in logistics is brutally hard because linehaul cost, fuel, driver pay, and accessorials all have different allocation logics, and most ERP systems give up and allocate overhead by revenue.
Financial analytics in logistics has to bridge the operational reality on the road (actual miles, actual fuel, actual driver pay, actual detention) with the financial system (standard rates, monthly close, revenue recognition). When you join them properly — at the load level, with proper cost pool allocation — you get a true margin view that finance, operations, and account management can all use without arguing about whose numbers are right. That alignment is worth more than any individual dashboard.
Load-level P&L with actual revenue, actual linehaul cost, actual fuel from the fuel card system, actual driver pay from settlements, actual accessorials from customer invoicing, and overhead allocated by a defensible driver (miles, loads, or asset time). The number that tells you which loads made money and which were carried by the rest of the book.
Customer-level profitability including accessorial leakage — the detention you should have billed but didn't, the layover not captured, the re-delivery that got waived. Often reveals that 10-15% of margin is being left on the table at the customer level, recoverable through better accessorial discipline.
Monthly variance analysis comparing actual vs standard cost and actual vs budgeted revenue at the lane and mode level. Identifies the operational drivers of variance — not just the financial impact — so operations and finance have the same conversation.
Logistics financial analytics built on a single source of truth: load-level P&L with actual cost sources, customer margin with accessorial leakage visibility, lane and mode variance analysis tied to operational drivers, reconciliation to the financial close, and the data dictionary that finance, operations, and account management all sign off on.
The full Financial Analytics Consulting practice across industries.
All logistics technology services from Xylity.
Industry-specific consulting across the verticals we serve.
Standard cost-per-mile numbers are almost always derived from fleet averages applied to every lane, which masks the reality that long-haul rural lanes have very different costs than multi-stop urban routes. The fix is lane-level cost calculation using actual driver pay, actual fuel by region, actual tolls, and maintenance allocation based on actual equipment utilization. Not trivial, but it's where the margin insights live.
By joining the TMS load detail (which records the events — detention, layover, re-delivery) with customer invoicing (which records what got billed) and calculating the gap. The gap is the leakage. Most logistics companies discover they're leaking 8-15% of theoretical accessorial revenue because the capture discipline at dispatch isn't there.
Yes. Pre-qualified analysts and analytics engineers with logistics accounting fluency — settlement processing, lane costing, accessorial reconciliation, and the SQL discipline to join TMS / fuel card / ERP data correctly. 4-stage consulting-led matching, 92% first-match acceptance.
True load-level P&L, accessorial leakage visibility, and lane variance tied to operational drivers — so finance and operations finally agree.