BI for federal, state, local, and DoD agencies — dashboards that meet Section 508, semantic layers that satisfy IG audits, and the governance discipline that survives leadership transitions. Built by consultants who know what Performance.gov reporting actually involves.
A government BI program goes live, the dashboards look good, and then the IG audit happens. The auditors ask basic questions: where does this number come from, who has access to it, how do we know it's accurate, when was it last validated, what happens if the underlying source system is wrong. The BI team can't answer most of them because the dashboards were built by individual analysts pulling from various sources, with no governed semantic layer, no documented data lineage, no access control discipline, and no validation against the systems of record. The IG report makes its way to OMB and the program is paused. This is not a hypothetical; it has happened at several federal agencies in the past five years.
Government BI done right is built like a regulated system from the beginning. Governed semantic layer with documented metric definitions. Data lineage from source system to dashboard, traceable for any audit question. Access controls aligned to data sensitivity and user role. Validation against systems of record, with documented reconciliation processes. Section 508 compliance for any public-facing or workforce-facing dashboard. Change control that survives leadership transitions. None of this is glamorous, but all of it is what separates BI that survives audits from BI that gets paused after the first IG review.
Automated performance reporting for Performance.gov, OMB Circular A-11, GPRA Modernization Act metrics, and the strategic plan reporting that OMB requires from every agency. Replaces the manual spreadsheet workflow that consumes senior analyst time every quarter.
Operational dashboards for program offices — case backlogs, processing times, service levels, regional performance, and the metrics that drive program management reviews. Built with Section 508 compliance and the semantic discipline that supports the inevitable IG follow-up question.
Data governance program — semantic layer, metric definitions, data stewardship roles, lineage documentation, and the policy framework that satisfies the Federal Data Strategy and the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act.
Government BI delivered audit-ready: governed semantic layer with documented metric definitions, dashboards that meet Section 508 / WCAG 2.1 AA, data lineage and stewardship documentation, integration with systems of record, role-based access controls, validation processes, automated Performance.gov and OMB reporting, and the IG audit response toolkit that gets the program through its first review with confidence.
The full Business Intelligence Consulting practice across industries.
All government technology services from Xylity.
Industry-specific consulting across the verticals we serve.
Power BI in GCC and GCC High has the strongest Microsoft 365 integration and the best price for high-volume internal use cases. Tableau Government has stronger public-facing dashboard publishing and more sophisticated visualization. Qlik is less common in federal but strong in state and local. We help you choose based on use case and existing licensing.
Through tool selection (some BI tools handle accessibility better than others), color contrast and font size discipline, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and ARIA labels on interactive elements. Public-facing dashboards get a formal accessibility audit before deployment. Internal workforce dashboards still need to meet Section 508 but the audit is less rigorous.
Yes. Pre-qualified BI developers and analytics engineers with public-trust and Secret clearances and experience in federal performance reporting, mission analytics, and Section 508 dashboard development. 92% first-match acceptance.
Section 508, semantic layer, data lineage, and audit-ready governance — BI built like the regulated system it is.